Legal Opinion

Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1941No. S. F. 16600PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, J., pro tem.

This action was brought to recover a loss suffered by plaintiff by reason of damage to a ten-ton truck, which it had sold under a conditional sales contract to one Thomas on November 28, 1932. From a judgment against both defendants and their two separate policies, both defendants appealed on separate records.

At all times herein mentioned plaintiff will be referred to as Fageol; defendant Pacific Indemnity Company will be referred to as Pacific; and the defendant Detroit Fire and Marine Insurance Company will be referred to as Detroit or appellant.

The vendee had paid only…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. De Cicco v. . SchweizerNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Cochran Oil Mill & Ginnery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Reynolds v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Ætna Ins. v. Sacramento-Stockton S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  5. Martin Music Co. v. RobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  4. California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API