Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, J., pro tem.
This action was brought to recover a loss suffered by plaintiff by reason of damage to a ten-ton truck, which it had sold under a conditional sales contract to one Thomas on November 28, 1932. From a judgment against both defendants and their two separate policies, both defendants appealed on separate records.
At all times herein mentioned plaintiff will be referred to as Fageol; defendant Pacific Indemnity Company will be referred to as Pacific; and the defendant Detroit Fire and Marine Insurance Company will be referred to as Detroit or appellant.
The vendee had paid only…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- De Cicco v. . SchweizerNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Cochran Oil Mill & Ginnery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Reynolds v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Ætna Ins. v. Sacramento-Stockton S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Martin Music Co. v. RobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.