Legal Opinion

Parker v. Funk

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1921No. L. A. No. 6555PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.

The present action is one of replevin for the possession of an automobile truck. Pending its determination, the plaintiff secured possession of a part of the truck, which was all the defendant had, upon a claim for delivery pursuant to sections 509 to 521 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The action was tried and resulted in a judgment that the plaintiff take nothing and that he either return the part of which he had secured possession or the defendant recover of him the value thereof, three hundred dollars. The plaintiff appeals. The facts are:

One Moon was engaged in the business of making…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Martin v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. National Hardware Co. v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Meyer v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. American National Bank of San Francisco v. A. G. Sommerville, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Quality Finance Co. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Whiting v. SquegliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API