Napavale, Inc. v. United National Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, J. pro tem. *
The question presented for decision is whether the automobile insurance policy issued by defendant indemnity company provided coverage for the loss by theft of a Golden Goddess Cadillac which had allegedly been purchased by plaintiff-appellant.
The said policy is a so-called “blanket insurance policy” which, when issued, covered certain automobiles specifically scheduled therein against loss by theft. The Golden Goddess Cadillac was not one of the scheduled automobiles. However, the policy contained an automatic coverage provision for newly acquired automobiles. Coverage…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Oil Base, Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Barnett v. London Assurance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by15 opinions
- Skaff v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Phillips v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Scarola v. INS. CO. OF N. AMER.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Treit v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Butler v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.