Dayley v. City of Burley
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Justice.
The plaintiff-respondents, Ardell Dayley and Max Dayley with their wives, instituted this quiet title action against the City of Burley and other defendants. The claims of all defendants other than the city were settled and are not involved in this appeal. In their complaint the plaintiffs alleged that the city had caused certain storm sewers or drains to be constructed which accumulated and diverted storm waters onto plaintiffs’ property, which they sought to enjoin. The defendant city answered the complaint, denying the allegations therein and as an affirmative defense to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Hutchinson v. Watson Slough Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Loosli v. HesemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- Teeter v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Scott v. WatkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by13 opinions
- Burgess v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Knodel v. Kassel TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Chester v. Wild Idaho Adventures RV Park, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- Merrill v. PenrodIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Rizzo v. State Farm InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.