Legal Opinion

LEVENE ET UX. v. City of Salem

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1951PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

The plaintiffs own and operate a veterinary hospital in the city of Salem. The hospital is conducted in a building owned by plaintiffs, located on the east side of the Pacific Highway upon an irregularly shaped tract of land, measuring roughly 78 feet by 350 feet, with its shorter side abutting upon the highway. The building is partly of wooden frame and partly of concrete construction, and has an area of about 20 feet by 40 feet. There is within plaintiffs’ property a draw or gully running easterly, roughly at right angles to the Pacific Highway. The highway crosses the gully on a fill.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Richards v. Washington Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Ashley v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Ewing, Ind. Exs. v. Wm. L. Foley, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1926

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. City of Whittier v. Whittier Fuel & Marine Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Buck v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Conam Alaska v. Bell Lavalin, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Tomasek v. Oregon State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1952

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API