Legal Opinion

Rizzo v. State Farm Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2013No. 39611PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

This case arises out of the water loss claims Appellant Roger Daniel Rizzo made under Respondent State Farm Fire and Casualty Company’s (“State Farm”) homeowners insurance policy. All of Rizzo’s claims were for water damage to his home’s basement. This is an appeal from the Ada County district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing all of Rizzo’s causes of action because Rizzo’s homeowners policy did not cover his water damage claims. Rizzo also appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to amend his complaint to include various new causes of action…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. White v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Idaho First National Bank v. Bliss Valley Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lovey v. Régence BlueShield of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Cascade Auto Glass, Inc. v. IDAHO FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Mortensen v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Serrano v. Four Seasons FramingIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Fonseca v. Corral Agriculture, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. James W. Clark v. State Ins FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. ABK v. Mid-Century InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API