Legal Opinion
In re Baby Z.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 26, 1999No. SC 15868; SC 15869PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALLAHAN, C. J.
These two appeals arise from an adoption application filed in the Probate Court by the petitioners, Anne and Malinda (hereinafter plaintiffs).1 The following facts and procedural history are undisputed. The plaintiffs, two unrelated women, have lived together for more than ten years. In re Baby Z., 45 Conn. Sup. 33, 34, 699 A.2d 1065 (1996). Together, they planned for the birth of Baby Z., who was conceived by artificial insemination and bom to Anne on May 10, 1992.2 Id. Since that time, the plaintiffs have shared parental responsibilities for Baby Z. Id.
On November 24,…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- SunTrust Bank, Nashville v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- In re the Adoption of L.O.F.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- In re Michaela Lee R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Fimiani v. Star Gallo Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In Re Adoption of LukeNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.