Legal Opinion

Morris v. Blossom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1930No. 27,927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The action is in the nature of a creditor’s bill to reach property formerly belonging to Edward M. Foster, deceased. It was originally brought by a simple contract creditor, but the administrators of Foster’s estate were subsequently .joined as plaintiffs. The right to maintain the action is not questioned. The evidence is voluminous and gives the details of numerous transactions. The findings cover 17 printed pages and are full and definite. An examination of the record satisfies us that they are all sustained…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barnes v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Knoblauch v. FoglesongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Conner v. HoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Rogers v. HedemarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Felton v. BisselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. LeRoy v. Marquette National Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Holmes v. ConterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Nippolt v. Farmers & Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Master Poultry Breeders, Inc. v. Iowa Hardware Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API