Legal Opinion

Empire Fire & Marine Insurance v. Williams

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1963No. 38,645PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

The sole issue for determination here is whether an insurer of an intoxicated motorist involved in an automobile accident may bring action under Minn. St. 340.95 (known as the Civil Damage Act) against a licensed on sale tavern owner, causing the insured’s intoxication, for sums which insurer has paid in settlement of claims against the insured arising out of the accident. Section 340.95 provides that:

“Every husband, wife, child, parent, guardian, employer, or other person who is injured in person or property, or means of support, by any intoxicated person, or by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Schmidt v. Driscoll Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Randall v. Village of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Cavin v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of IsleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Village of HewittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Milbank Mutual Insurance v. Village of Rose CreekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Evans v. KennedySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API