Legal Opinion

LeRoy v. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 9, 1979No. 48577PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Plaintiff Marjorie Congdon LeRoy, appealing from an order for judgment and judgment of the Hennepin County District Court, challenges the determination of the trial court that defendant trustees were entitled to take possession of and title to stock, which she had pledged as collateral for a promissory note between defendant bank and herself, upon payment of that note by defendant trustees acting in the capacity of co-makers or accommodation parties. We affirm.

On May 28, 1974, plaintiff alone executed a promissory note payable in six months to defendant Marquette National Bank…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Farmers Union Oil Company v. FladelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Knoblauch v. FoglesongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Torp v. GulsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Brekken v. HolienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ruberg v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Dalton v. George B. Hatley Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Utah Farm Production Credit Ass'n v. WattsUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Weast v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. First Dakota National Bank v. MaxonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API