Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Conter
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 10, 1941No. 32,562PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gallagher, Chief Justice.
Defendants Anna E. and Margaret B. Conter acquired the property here involved by inheritance from their father in 1910. They failed to pay taxes for the years 1925 to 1934, inclusive, so the property was sold at tax sale for each of these years and bid in by the state.
On May 13, 1936, plaintiff procured a certificate of sale for taxes for 1925 on the property from the auditor of Ramsey county for which he paid $35.91. On the same day he also procured a certificate of sale for taxes for the years 1926 to 1934, inclusive. Shortly thereafter he caused a notice of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Peterson v. First National Bank of CeylonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Gallagher v. Irish-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Crosby v. FarmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- City of Duluth v. DibbleeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Connelly v. Carnegie Dock & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Van DeRyt v. Van DeRytOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Gelin v. HollisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Thunderbird Motel Corporation v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Holmes v. ConterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Severson v. EngbarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.