Legal Opinion

Nippolt v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 17, 1932No. 28,607PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoring, J.

In an action upon a promissory note for $8,000, the plaintiffs prevailed on a trial before the court without a jury. The defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied, and it has appealed.

Peter Thorsten was the owner of a quarter section of land in Redwood county which in June, 1919, he sold to Reinertson and Anderson on a contract for deed for a consideration of $20,000. This contract for deed provided that Thorsten might put a mortgage upon the premises and that Reinertson and Anderson would assume it. Accordingly Thorsten mortgaged the land to the State Bank of Springfield for $8,000. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knoblauch v. FoglesongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Morris v. BlossomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First National City Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  2. Kentucky Joint Stock Land Bank v. Farmers Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. State v. ShoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. First National City Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API