Nippolt v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtBoring, J.
In an action upon a promissory note for $8,000, the plaintiffs prevailed on a trial before the court without a jury. The defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied, and it has appealed.
Peter Thorsten was the owner of a quarter section of land in Redwood county which in June, 1919, he sold to Reinertson and Anderson on a contract for deed for a consideration of $20,000. This contract for deed provided that Thorsten might put a mortgage upon the premises and that Reinertson and Anderson would assume it. Accordingly Thorsten mortgaged the land to the State Bank of Springfield for $8,000. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Knoblauch v. FoglesongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Morris v. BlossomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- First National City Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Kentucky Joint Stock Land Bank v. Farmers Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- State v. ShoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- First National City Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976