Legal Opinion

Champlin v. Carter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1920No. 10945PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Original action for writ of mandamus by H. IT. Champlin against Frank O. Carter, State Auditor, to compel acceptance of certain sum in payment of state income tax due from plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, C. J.

This is an original action instituted in this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the State Auditor to accept a certain sum in full settlement of the income tax, due to the state of Oklahoma by the plaintiff. Plaintiff filed his income tax return with the auditor as provided by law for the year 1918, deducting from his gross income the sum for depletion, based, as he alleges, upon the actual depletion of the oil and gas property from which the income is derived, and' the State Auditor refused to approve the return so filed and presented to plaintiff for his signature an amended return…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. The Board of Commr's of Knox County v. AspinwallSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  3. Norris v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Ex parte OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Lovett, Creek County Com'rs v. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. Green-Boots Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Bath v. DumasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Witt v. WentzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Hinkle v. KennySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Board of Com'rs of Carter County v. WortenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API