Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Witt v. Wentz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 14, 1930No. 20765PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Messrs. Witt, Williams, and Tatum sought a writ of mandamus below to compel the members of the State Highway Commission to issue what is known as a work order and to engineer, supervise, re- eeive, and accept work, when the same shall have been done, as contemplated by a certain written contract said to exist between them, as contractors, and the state of Oklahoma, represented by the members of the State Highway Commission. The subject-matter of the contract was a $45,000 bridge and culvert item of a road construction project located on State Hig'hway No. 10, in Pushmataha county, between the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Porter v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Champlin v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Morris v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Rawleigh Co. v. RoyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Clark v. ChildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Draper v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Morrison v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. District Court, Fifteenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Morton v. Adair County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API