Legal Opinion
Hinkle v. Kenny
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 6, 1936No. 26533PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.
This is an original proceeding in this court whereby the petitioner, I-Ionry Hinkle, Jr., by II. Q. Hinkle, his father and next friend seeks a writ of mandamus directed to Roy W. Kenny in his official, position as warden of the penitentiary of the state, of Oklahoma.
The petitioner was delivered to the warden of the penitentiary on the 18th day of April, 1934, under two commitments issued in pursuance of judgments of conviction in the district courts of Garvin and Oklahoma counties, Okla. Each of these judgments of conviction, entered apparently without reference to each other, provided that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex Parte EldridgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- State Ex Rel. Ikard v. Russell, JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Stearns, Mayor v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Ex Parte BellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Ex Parte StrauchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- Lawhorn v. RobertsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.