Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Black

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 22, 1888No. 991PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

128 U.S. 40

Dunlap

v.

Black.

No. 991.

Supreme Court of United States.

This was an application by Oscar Dunlap, the relator, to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, for a writ of mandamus to be directed to the respondent, Black, as Commissioner of Pensions, commanding him to re-issue to the relator his pension certificate for $25 per month from June 6, 1866; $31.25 per month from June 4, 1872; $50 per month from June 4, 1874; and $72 per month from June 17, 1878, first deducting all sums paid relator under previous pensions.

By the act of March 3, 1873, 17 Stat. 569, c. 234, § 4, Rev. Stat.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Erspamer v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  4. In re the Fee Agreement of CoxUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
  5. Norris v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API