Olson v. Haas
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Per curiam
Petitioners Haas, Lewis and McCray have filed a motion for discretionary review of a trial court order compelling the production of certain documents. The trial court determined that the documents were not protected by the attorney/client privilege and ordered disclosure. We grant review, reverse and remand.
In a suit which preceded the present action, Haas represented Norman Anderson and the Olsons on claims which were tried in federal court. Anderson and Olson received a jury verdict in their favor for business loss and Anderson also apparently received a verdict for general damages. In the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Dike v. DikeWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Cummings v. ShermanWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Williamson v. WilliamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- Seattle Northwest Securities Corp. v. SDG Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Harris v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Harris v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Whetstone v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- State v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.