Legal Opinion

Olson v. Haas

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 23, 1986No. 17524-6-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners Haas, Lewis and McCray have filed a motion for discretionary review of a trial court order compelling the production of certain documents. The trial court determined that the documents were not protected by the attorney/client privilege and ordered disclosure. We grant review, reverse and remand.

In a suit which preceded the present action, Haas represented Norman Anderson and the Olsons on claims which were tried in federal court. Anderson and Olson received a jury verdict in their favor for business loss and Anderson also apparently received a verdict for general damages. In the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Dike v. DikeWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Cummings v. ShermanWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Williamson v. WilliamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Seattle Northwest Securities Corp. v. SDG Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. Harris v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Harris v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Whetstone v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. State v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API