Legal Opinion

Whetstone v. Olson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 22, 1986No. 7971-2-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reed, A.C.J.

The plaintiff, lone Susan Whetstone, seeks reversal of a trial court order dismissing with prejudice her sexual harassment suit against her former employer and a fellow employee. We are asked to decide whether the trial court was correct when it concluded that the plaintiff could not rely on the attorney/client privilege in order to prevent an in camera inspection of a taped communication made by her to her former attorney. The trial court ruled that a sufficient inference had been created that this communication related to the furtherance of a contemplated fraud so as to defeat…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glasgow v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. A,B,C,D,E,F,G, & H v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. In Re Grand Jury Proceeding.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. North Pacific Lumber Co. v. UnisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Snedigar v. HoddersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  2. Camer v. Seattle School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. United States v. SkeddleDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
  4. State v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Hamilton v. HugginsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API