Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Sherman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1943No. 28740PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

— This action was instituted in the superior court of Spokane county, in which action respondent Cummings, as plaintiff, and respondents Shinn and Umbach, as cross-complainants, sought to obtain an interest in the estate of Phoebe Shinn, deceased. Recovery was predicated in the complaint and cross-complaint upon the allegations that Homer J. Shinn and Phoebe Shinn, husband and wife, had made mutual, identical, and reciprocal wills, by the terms of which respondents were entitled to receive certain interests in the estate left by Mr. and Mrs. Shinn. The case tried to the court resulted in the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hurlburt v. . HurlburtNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Palmquist v. SagstadWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Brown v. WebsterNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Prince v. PrinceWashington Supreme Court · 1911

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kirk v. BeardTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Paley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. O'CONNOR v. ImmeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API