Legal Opinion

Harris v. Drake

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 18, 2003No. 27402-7-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

The main question in this appeal is whether, in an action brought by a PIP (Personal Injury Protection) insured against a third-party tortfeasor, the work product privilege protects facts and opinions acquired, prepared, and developed by a PIP medical examiner whom the PIP insured does not expect to call at trial. In our opinion, the answer is yes.

On April 26, 1996, Bradley Harris was rear-ended by Doris Drake. He did not seek medical attention at the scene. That night, however, he began having “shooting pain deep in his left shoulder.”1

The next day, Harris went to a hospital emergency room.…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Swidler & Berlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harris v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Harris v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Ki Sin Kim v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Department of Social & Health Services v. ParvinWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Hoskins v. ReichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API