Legal Opinion

State v. Rainey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 28, 2014No. 68846-4-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Verellen, A.C.J.

¶1 During a hearing on Rickey Rainey’s motion for a new trial, the trial court closed the *834courtroom, conducted an in camera review, and concluded that a witness could assert her Fifth Amendment1 privilege against self-incrimination. The witness did not take the stand or personally assert the privilege in open court before the in camera proceeding occurred, and the trial court did not conduct a Bone-Club analysis before closing the courtroom.2 Under the “experience and logic” test, a witness’s assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in an…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Personal Restraint Petition Of Calvin Artie EagleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. State Of Washington v. Michael Joseph LeclechCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State v. FrawleyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. FrawleyWashington Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API