State v. Rainey
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Verellen, A.C.J.
¶1 During a hearing on Rickey Rainey’s motion for a new trial, the trial court closed the *834courtroom, conducted an in camera review, and concluded that a witness could assert her Fifth Amendment1 privilege against self-incrimination. The witness did not take the stand or personally assert the privilege in open court before the in camera proceeding occurred, and the trial court did not conduct a Bone-Club analysis before closing the courtroom.2 Under the “experience and logic” test, a witness’s assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in an…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Calvin Artie EagleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Michael Joseph LeclechCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. FrawleyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. FrawleyWashington Supreme Court · 2014