Legal Opinion
State v. Emmanuel
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1953No. 32241PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDon worth, J.
The defendant was charged by information, in three counts, with the crime of bribery in violation of RCW 9.18.020 (cf. Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2321). The jury returned a verdict of guilty on all three counts. He then *802moved for a new trial, and the motion was denied. From the judgment and sentence pronounced against him on the verdict, defendant has appealed.
The prosecuting witness, J. H. England, was engaged in the logging and timber business in Winlock, Washington. During the course of his business he purchased two tracts of timber from the state of Washington. The purchase of the first tract was…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. CrankUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. WappensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Croft v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court · 1985
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.