Legal Opinion
Smith v. Continental Oil Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1945No. Civil Action No. 3863PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover unpaid overtime.compensation for work al-' leged to have been performed between October 24, 1938 (the effective date of the Act), and May 31, 1941 (the time when his employment ceased), an additional equal amount as liquidated damages, and attorney’s fees, pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Pub. Law 718, 75th Cong., 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. § 216(b). The answer of the defendant asserts among other defenses that:
“X. The alleged cause of action for compensation for overtime work…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Klotz v. IppolitoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1941
- Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Swift & Co. v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fullerton v. LammOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- Shandelman v. SchumanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Rockton & Rion Ry. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Kuly v. White Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.