Legal Opinion

McClaine v. Rankin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 6, 1905No. 58PublishedCited by 163 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. The First National Bank of South Bend, .Washington, became insolvent and was closed August 10, 1895, and on the seventeenth day of the same month one Heim was appointed receiver, who was succeeded by Aldrich, and Aldrich by George C. Rankin. August 17, 1896, the acting Comptroller of the Currency levied an assessment against the shareholders of the bank in enforcement of their statutory liability.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. The First National Bank of South Bend, .Washington, became insolvent and was closed August 10, 1895, and on the seventeenth day of the same month one Heim was appointed receiver, who was succeeded by Aldrich, and Aldrich by George C. Rankin. August 17, 1896, the acting Comptroller of the Currency levied an assessment against the shareholders of the bank in enforcement of their statutory liability. Adolphus F. Mc-Claine, one of the stockholders, was notified of the levy, and demand was duly made of him to pay the assessment on or…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

It is conceded that, in the absence of any provision of the act of 'Congress creating the liability, fixing a limitation of time for commencing actions to enforce it, the statute of limitations of the particular State is applicable. Rev. Stat. §721; Campbell v. Haverhill, 155 U. S. 610. If, then, this action was barred by the statute of limitations of the State of Washington, that ended it, and both judgments below must be reversed and the cause remanded to the' Circuit Court with a direction that judgment be entered for defendant.

Reference to the state statutes shows that subdivision 2 of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Campbell v. HaverhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Matteson v. DentSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by163 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API