Legal Opinion
Shandelman v. Schuman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 17, 1950No. Civ. 10534PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
This action was instituted under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 1 to recover alleged unpaid overtime compensation, an equal amount as liquidated damages, and the attorney’s fee. It is now before me on the defendant’s motion to dismiss a portion of the complaint as being barred by the statute of limitations, and on the defendant’s motion to strike another portion of the complaint as being impertinent.
The complaint alleges that the defendant is engaged in the wholesale fruit and produce business for interstate commerce, that the defendant employed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. KeenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- Reid v. Solar CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1946
- Drabkin v. Gibbs & Hill, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Smith v. Continental Oil Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1945
3Cited by17 opinions
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor v. The Behrens Drug CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Jones v. Tracy School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Soler v. G & U, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Henchy v. City of AbseconDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Aubry v. GoldhorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.