Legal Opinion

Klotz v. Ippolito

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 21, 1941No. 62PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNERLY, District Judge.

By Complaint filed January 13, 1941, plaintiff instituted this suit against defendant, to recover overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Sections 201 to 219, Title 29 U.S.C.A. An amended complaint, upon which the case was tried, was filed April 5, 1941. It is alleged that plaintiff was employed by defendant July 12, 1937, and worked for defendant until February 6, 1940, when he was discharged. Plaintiff sues for overtime under such Act from October 24, 1938, until February 6, 1940, the time of his discharge, and for damages and attorney’s fees. .

Defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fleming v. AH Belo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. Reeves v. Howard County Refining Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1940
  3. A. H. Belo Corp. v. StreetDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1941

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Jax Beer Co. v. RedfernCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  3. Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Walling v. Goldblatt Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  5. Bumpus v. Continental Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API