Legal Opinion

Matter of Lennan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 22, 1986PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding results from a random compliance audit of the trust funds of respondent, John R. Lennan, by the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) pursuant to Rule l:21-6(c). Upon receipt of the auditor’s report, the OAE filed a Petition for Emergent Relief, which we granted on September 21, 1984, temporarily suspending respondent from the practice of law. Thereafter, the OAE filed a complaint charging that respondent misappropriated his clients’ funds in violation of DR 9-102 and DR 1-102(A)(3), (4) and (6). Respondent filed an answer admitting the factual allegations of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. In Re GavelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Matter of SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. In Re SmockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of SkevinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. Matter of WarhaftigSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. In the Matter of Dennis M. Barlow, an Attorney-At-LawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Matter of SommersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. In re ShellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API