Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Dennis M. Barlow, an Attorney-At-Law

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 19, 1995PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Following an audit performed in the summer of 1991 by the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE), the District XIV Ethics Committee (DEC) filed a three-count complaint on December 31, 1992, charging respondent, Dennis M. Barlow, with record-keeping violations, gross neglect in failing to safeguard client funds, and knowing misappropriation of client funds. Respondent does not dispute the first two charges, but argues that the OAE has failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he knowingly misappropriated client funds.

The charge of knowing misappropriation arises from two real estate…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of HollendonnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Matter of SkevinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Matter of SiegelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Matter of GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Matter of RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. People v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. KatzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API