Legal Opinion

Matter of Sommers

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 17, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding arises out of three presentments filed by the District II-B (Bergen County South) Ethics Committee (the DEC Committee), which concluded in each matter that respondent had committed unethical conduct. The Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) agreed with the DEC’S finding of unethical conduct, and unanimously recommended that respondent be disbarred. We remanded the matter to the DEC for a further hearing on respondent’s claim of right to the funds that the DRB determined he had misappropriated. After a hearing the DEC concluded “based upon the facts adduced and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of HollendonnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Matter of HeinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Matter of SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of KonopkaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. In the Matter of Dennis M. Barlow, an Attorney-At-LawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. MATTER OF LaVIGNESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. In re La VigneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. Matter of KonopkaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API