Legal Opinion

Matter of Warhaftig

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 21, 1987PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary proceeding, arising out of a presentment filed by the District XII Ethics Committee, respondent is charged with invading trust account funds by withdrawing anticipated legal fees in advance of real-estate closings. The Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board) concluded that respondent had engaged in unethical conduct, but that knowing misappropriation had not been established by clear and convincing evidence. The Board therefore recommended that respon dent be publicly reprimanded. Because we conclude that respondent’s conduct clearly constituted knowing misappropriation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. In Re GavelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Matter of HeinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Matter of FleischerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Matter of GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Matter of KonopkaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. Matter of SilvermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. In the Matter of Dennis M. Barlow, an Attorney-At-LawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. Matter of RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API