Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Shelly

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 9, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice law in the State of New Jersey in 1973. He practiced as a solo practitioner in Monmouth County. Respondent has not been the subject of any previous disciplinary action.

This disciplinary proceeding arises out of a complaint filed against respondent by the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) alleging five counts of ethics violations relating to his representation of Concetta “Babe” Roden.

I

Counts One, Two, and Three of the formal ethics complaint charged respondent with knowing misappropriation of client trust funds with respect to (1) $40,000 taken from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of HollendonnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. In Re SearsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  5. Matter of PerezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re ArnejaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. In Re FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  3. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  5. William S. Wong v. Terry RamnananDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API