Legal Opinion
Hansen v. D'Artenay
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 18, 1932No. Docket No. 746PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This isan action to quiet title. It was filed by respondents on June 20, 1929. Appellants asserted and defended upon the grounds of an interest in and the right to the possession of the property in question under a contract of purchase and sale made with respondents. The trial court held that appellants had forfeited their rights under the contract by a breach of its conditions and gave judgment for respondents.
A former action had been instituted by respondents against appellants on October 25, 1927, in which they sought to quiet title to the property in question and relied upon breaches of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Peterson v. WagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- W. F. Boardman Co. v. PetchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Stein v. ArchibaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- D. Ghirardelli & Co. v. Students' Express & Transfer Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Crane's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Milovich v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Nelson v. SchoettgenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Berdan v. BerdanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.