Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Wagner

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1921No. Civ. No. 2264PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an appeal by separate defendants (C. A. Wagner and A. A. Merkeley) and defendant B. F. Hall from a judgment terminating, invalidating, and voiding three written instruments for the purchase of hops for the years 1918, 1919, and 1920, and also for injunctive relief, enjoining and restraining defendants, their agents, attorneys, and assignees, from doing any act which would prevent plaintiff from having peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property mentioned in said instruments.

There are two appeals growing out of the same transaction and presented here upon two separate and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wooten v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Simmons v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Hansen v. D'ArtenayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. State v. MoriartyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Frankish v. Federal Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Gilday v. HauchwitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API