D. Ghirardelli & Co. v. Students' Express & Transfer Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The Students’ Express and Transfer Company leased the dead wall of its building to the Diamond Rubber Company under a writing which declared, “In consideration of painting my sign on building as agreed free of charge value $40 I hereby lease to undersigned, lessee,” the wall of building located, etc., “for advertising purposes for a period of five years from date with privilege to said lessee to further use said space for a like consideration from year to year, not however to exceed five years.” The Diamond Rubber Company then upon this wall painted the advertising sign of the Transfer…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Tennant v. WildeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Weaver v. GrunbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Hansen v. D'ArtenayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Quality Building & Securities Co. v. BledsoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- City of San Diego v. La Mesa Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.