Legal Opinion

Erickson v. F. McLellan & Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1907No. 6592PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered April 16, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action upon contract.

1Per curiam

The respondent brought this action against the appellant to recover the sum of $1,542.90. In his complaint he alleged, in substance, that he had entered into a contract with the appellant by the terms of which he agreed to do certain work in improving a public street in the city of Seattle which the appellant was under contract with the city *662to do; the work consisting of certain grubbing and clearing, and excavating and filling, the first to be paid for in a lump sum, and the other at so much per cubic yard; alleging further that he had fully performed all of the terms and conditions of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Distler v. DabneyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Osten v. WinehillWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crim v. DrakeSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  2. Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Henry v. Bruhn & Henry, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hedgecock v. MendelWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Peterson v. Granger Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API