Legal Opinion

Hedgecock v. Mendel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1928No. 20891. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Louis L. Mendel and his wife, the owners of lot 6, block 6, of the plat of Seattle as laid out by the heirs of Sarah A. Bell, deceased, entered into a duly acknowledged written contract on May 13,. 1924, by which they leased the property to W. Gr. Hedgecock for the period commencing June 1, 1924, and ending December.31, 1973. The lease provided for. the payment of monthly rentals in specified amounts and also gave the lessee the option to purr chase .the property within each two years, three years and five years at prices fixed in the contract. The lease further provided:

“This lease' cannot…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Erickson v. F. McLellan & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nassif v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  2. Witzel v. TenaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Tollius v. Dutch Inns of America, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Robbins v. Hunts Food & Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Eastway Plaza, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API