Osten v. Winehill
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, C. J.
The essential parts of the complaint in this case are that between the 23d day of September, 1890, and the 5th day of November, 1890, the firm of Osten & Co., at the request of appellants, performed work and labor and furnished materials consisting of stone work, brick work, plastering and cement for a certain building, the alleged property of the appellants, of the reasonable worth and value of $8,517.55, and an assignment of the claim to the plaintiffs for the sum named. The answer denied the contract alleged ; admitted that certain work…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Distler v. DabneyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Clark v. ShermanWashington Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clemmons v. McGeerWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Crim v. DrakeSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Erickson v. F. McLellan & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Child Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. PageWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Smart v. BurquoinWashington Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.