Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Granger Irrigation District
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1926No. 19763. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
The appellant secured from the respondents a deed for a right of way for a pipe line across respondents’ land, accompanied by an agreement, wherein it was provided that, in the event the parties could not agree upon the amount of damage occasioned by the construction of the pipe line, that amount was to he determined in this way:
“If the parties hereto shall fail to agree upon the amount of said damage within thirty days after the completion of the construction of said pipe line, then the parties hereto agree that the differences shall be submitted to a board of appraisers, one to be selected…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. VansantWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Hatch v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- McCorkle v. MalloryWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Duncan v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Erickson v. F. McLellan & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hegeberg v. New England Fish Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Fancher v. EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Black Mountain Ranch v. Black Mountain Development Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Gord v. F. S. Harmon & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Diamond Parking, Inc. v. Martin Theaters of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982