Legal Opinion
Burd v. New Jersey Telephone Company
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 17, 1977PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
149 N.J. Super. 20 (1977)
372 A.2d 1355
CLARENCE BURD AND MARY BURD, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
NEW JERSEY TELEPHONE COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION AND CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY, A CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 4, 1977.
Decided March 17, 1977.
Before Judges LORA, CRANE and MICHELS.
Mr. William P. Ries argued the cause for appellant New Jersey Telephone Company (Messrs. Purcell, Ries and Shannon, attorneys).
Mr. Arthur G. D'Alessandro argued the cause for appellant Continental Oil…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Farrell v. Votator Division of Chemetron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- New Market Poultry Farms, Inc. v. FELLOWSSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hermes v. StaianoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Rescigno v. PicinichNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- PT & L. CONST. v. Madigan & HylandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co. v. Conklin Assocs.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Seibert v. CatheyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.