Legal Opinion

Hermes v. Staiano

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 11, 1981PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

181 N.J. Super. 424 (1981)

437 A.2d 925

FRANCIS X. HERMES AND CONSTANCE HERMES, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

LOUIS STAIANO, EMMA STAIANO, HIS WIFE, AND STAIANO WOOD PRODUCTS, INC., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Hunterdon County.

Decided September 11, 1981.

Thomas R. Chesson for plaintiffs (Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, attorneys).

William A. Shurts for defendants (Felter, Cain & Shurts, attorneys).

LOUIS H. MILLER, J.S.C.

This matter comes before the court on defendants' application to dismiss the complaint at the conclusion of plaintiffs' case. The motion was originally made returnable on the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Huddell v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Burd v. New Jersey Telephone CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Barnes v. Mac Brown and Company, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. McDonald v. MianeckiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sewell v. GregoryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Aronsohn v. MandaraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Richards v. Powercraft Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Tyus v. RestaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API