Legal Opinion
Seibert v. Cathey
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 26, 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
216 N.J. Super. 197 (1987)
523 A.2d 267
CINDY SEIBERT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL CATHEY AND STUART SALVATO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 9, 1987.
Decided March 26, 1987.
Before Judges MORTON I. GREENBERG, R.S. COHEN and GRUCCIO.
Gary M. Schwartz argued the cause for appellant (Schwartz & Schiappa, attorneys; Joseph P. Schiappa, on the brief).
Sharon Handrock Moore argued the cause for respondents (Gebhardt & Kiefer, attorneys; Sharon Handrock Moore and Richard P. Cushing, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by MORTON I.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burd v. New Jersey Telephone CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick and Gamon Meter Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Tyson v. GrozeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Burd v. New Jersey Telephone CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Hadden v. Eli Lilly and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Abboud v. ViscomiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Green v. Auerbach Chevrolet Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Apgar v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Green v. Auerbach Chevrolet Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Tobon v. 8894 Tonnele Avenue Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993