Legal Opinion
PT & L. CONST. v. Madigan & Hyland
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 10, 1991PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
245 N.J. Super. 201 (1991)
584 A.2d 850
P.T. & L. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
MADIGAN AND HYLAND, INC., MADIGAN-PRAEGAR, INC., AND U.R.S. COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 18, 1990.
Decided January 10, 1991.
Before Judges MICHELS, GRUCCIO and D'ANNUNZIO.
Steven Backfisch argued the cause for appellants-cross-respondents (Whipple, Ross & Hirsh, attorneys; Paul J. Hirsh and Steven Backfisch, of counsel and on the brief).
Herbert C. Klein argued the cause for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Farrell v. Votator Division of Chemetron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Burd v. New Jersey Telephone CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Vispisiano v. Ashland Chemical Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Grunwald v. BronkeshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Russo Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- E & H Steel Corp. v. PSEG Fossil, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- Grunwald v. BronkeshNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.