Legal Opinion

Collins v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 2, 1985No. 84-ACK-176; CA A33599PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Petitioners seek judicial review of an acknowledgment order issued by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) declaring that the City of Jacksonville’s comprehensive plan and land use regulations (Plan) are in compliance with LCDC’s Statewide Planning Goals. The issues on review are whether LCDC violated ORS 197.251 and Goal 5 by acknowledging the Plan without the required identification and evaluation of conflicts over the use of open spaces around the city’s historic buildings and whether LCDC violated ORS 197.251 and Goal 14 by approving an urban growth boundary (UGB) with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lake Oswego Preservation Society v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Ramsey v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Schatz v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API