Legal Opinion
Laughlin v. School District No. 1
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 10, 1984No. CA A25473PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Respondents Laughlin (parents) brought this complaint before the Department of Education (department), alleging that Multnomah County School District No. (district) failed to provide a “free appropriate public education” for their son, Scott, and otherwise violated various provisions of ORS chapter 343, the department’s administrative rules, OAR ch 581, div 15, the Education For All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (the EHA), 20 USC § 1400 et seq (1982), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. 29 USC § 794 (1982). The department found that the district had violated applicable state and federal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Boxall v. Sequoia Union High School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Mahoney v. Administrative School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hoeft v. Tucson Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Megan C. v. Independent School District No. 625District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Beth v. Ex Rel. Yvonne v. v. CarrollDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Mrs. W. v. TirozziDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.