Legal Opinion
Wasniewski v. Quick and Reilly, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 9, 2009No. SC 18160PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
The defendant, Quick and Reilly, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, James W. Wasniewski. The plaintiff initiated this breach of contract action to recover funds that his father had deposited without the plaintiffs knowledge in an account bearing the plaintiffs name at the defendant brokerage firm. The certified issues in this appeal are: (1) whether “the Appellate Court [majority] properly conclude [d] that valid delivery of an inter vivos gift was effected by the plaintiffs father to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Minor v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Dow & Condon, Inc. v. Brookfield Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Kriedel v. KrampitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Main's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilcox v. Webster Insurance, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Har v. BoreikoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- McCook v. Whitebirch Construction, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.