Legal Opinion
Dow & Condon, Inc. v. Brookfield Development Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 11, 2003No. SC 16774PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
This appeal arises from an action in which the plaintiff, Dow and Condon, Inc., doing business as Colliers, Dow and Condon, sought to recover a real estate broker’s commission in connection *574with a lease entered into by Federal Express Corporation (Federal Express) as tenant and the defendant, Brookfield Development Corporation, as landlord. After a trial to the court, judgment was rendered for the defendant on the ground that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover a commission because it had violated General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 20-325a (a)1 and § 20-328-8a (e)…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Cadle Co. v. D'AddarioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Wilcox v. Webster Insurance, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Rizzuto v. Davidson Ladders, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- D'ERAMO v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.