Legal Opinion
Kriedel v. Krampitz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 20, 1951PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiff, administrator of the estate of Adolph Schmidt, brought suit in the Superior Court to recover from the defendant a sum of money on deposit in the City Savings Bank in Middletown which he claimed belonged to the estate. The defendant denied that it did and alleged in a special defense that it was a gift to him from the intestate. The court rendered judgment for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed.
The plaintiff seeks substantial changes in the finding. His claims are without merit. The court found the following material facts: Schmidt and the defendant had been friends…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Camp's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- Candee v. Connecticut Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Meriden Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Meriden Savings Bank v. McCormackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Guinan's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Bridgeport Pipe Engineering Co. v. DeMatteo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Kukanskis v. JasutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Testone v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Dick v. DickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Dalia v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.