Gallatin v. Corning Irrigation Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County and from an order refusing a new trial. A. J. Buckles, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. McCoy & Gans, and Heller, Powers and Ehrman, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
Each plaintiff owns a parcel of land which, it is claimed, abuts upon Elder Creek and South Elder Creek in Tehama County. South Elder Creek is a tributary to Elder Creek. The aggregate area of the several parcels is about forty-seven…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Miller v. Bay Cities Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Williams v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Modoc Land & Live Stock Co. v. BoothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Motl v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Lindblom v. Round Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Chowchilla Farms Inc. v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Stonaker v. Big Sisters HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.