Domrese v. City of Roslyn
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal-from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Kauffman, J., entered November 19, 1914, in favor of the defendant, in an action to enjoin the diversion of the waters of a stream, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
Appellant Minna Domrese is the owner of a tract of land situate in a mountain canon near the city of Roslyn. Appellant Hamer is her lessee.
In 1909, respondent put in a system of waterworks. It took its supply of water from Cedar creek, which flows in the canon and over the lands of appellant Domrese. The water was taken at a point above, and conducted through a pipe line over and across, her land. At the. time the work was in progress, she objected to the trespass of the city. After some negotiations, she executed a deed for a right of way for the pipe line and the city completed its work.
In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Kakeldy v. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Casassa v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Thorberg v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Stewart v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by20 opinions
- State ex rel. Peel v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Aylmore v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Brazil v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- London v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Olympic Pipe Line Co. v. ThoenyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.