Legal Opinion
Raser v. Moomaw
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 26, 1914No. 11507PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered April 14, 1913, dismissing an action for fraud, on sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
In this action the appellant sought to recover from the respondents for fraud and deceit. In his complaint, the appellant stated his cause of action as follows:
“Plaintiff complaining against defendants alleges:
“(1) That plaintiff is now and at all times herein mentioned was engaged as a real estate broker in the city of Seattle.
“(2) That at all the dates and times herein mentioned the defendants were husband and wife, and as such constituted a community under the laws of the state of Washington.
“(3) That during the month of November, 1910, the defendant, George A. Moomaw, acting on behalf of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sellar v. ClellandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
- Lahay v. City National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Pigott v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by11 opinions
- Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Dobbin v. Pacific Coast Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- Hamilton v. MihillsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Andrews v. Standard Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Biel v. TolsmaWashington Supreme Court · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.